Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2001 07:54:19 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> To: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> Cc: Jonathan Chen <jon@spock.org>, freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG, gibbs@scsiguy.com Subject: Re: NEWCARD update Message-ID: <200101071454.f07EsJs06193@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 07 Jan 2001 02:03:43 PST." <200101071003.f07A3hB01022@mobile.wemm.org> References: <200101071003.f07A3hB01022@mobile.wemm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200101071003.f07A3hB01022@mobile.wemm.org> Peter Wemm writes: : Personally, I think the bridge itself should be setting this policy since : there appears to be a status bit for the bridge to tell if one of its : cards triggered the interrupt. The bridge can perform the sharing logic : itself. Yes. That's the right place for it. I think all the folks that have approached this issue agree on that. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200101071454.f07EsJs06193>