Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 06 May 2006 19:56:17 -0600
From:      Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>
To:        Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Chris <chrcoluk@gmail.com>, Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com>, stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1
Message-ID:  <445D53C1.90601@samsco.org>
In-Reply-To: <20060506204720.S46997@fledge.watson.org>
References:  <4457A02C.9040408@rogers.com>	<35c231bf0605032011s65fbb1aby742438465ee98ee7@mail.gmail.com>	<20060504033300.GA39935@xor.obsecurity.org>	<44598615.3040400@rogers.com>	<20060504044758.GA41047@xor.obsecurity.org>	<44599732.1050905@rogers.com>	<20060505080543.GD5466@garage.freebsd.pl>	<35c231bf0605051049t2761281ar97b9634b8279b1fd@mail.gmail.com>	<445B991F.3050600@rogers.com>	<6.2.3.4.0.20060505145259.10d8dca0@64.7.153.2>	<3aaaa3a0605061238ib77bb38x6f61eb6cc1c1c6c1@mail.gmail.com> <20060506204720.S46997@fledge.watson.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Robert Watson wrote:

> 
> On Sat, 6 May 2006, Chris wrote:
> 
>> are snapshots a default setting?
> 
> 
> In case people want to avoid using snapshots, here are the uses I'm 
> currently aware of in the base system:
> 
> - Background file system check uses snapshots.  This can be disabled by 
> using
>   background_fsck="NO" in /etc/rc.conf.
> 
> - dump uses snapshots if the -L paramater is specified, in order to take an
>   atomic backup of the system.  It won't use snapshots unless explicitly
>   specified.
> 
> - mksnap_ffs uses snapshots, as it's the operator snapshot creation tool.
> 
> FWIW, I and a moderate number of other people use snapshots daily on 
> quite busy and over-burdened machines without problems.
> 
> Also, as an FYI, several quota-related snapshot fixes went into CVS in 
> the last 24-48 hours.  Once they've settled for a few weeks, and 
> assuming they don't have complex dependencies, they will get merged to 
> RELENG_6. Presumably if there is sufficient demand, and they adequately 
> address the reports of deadlocks with quotas+snapshots, they could be 
> merged to RELENG_6_1 as an errata update.

Exactly my thinking also.  In about 2-3 weeks time, we'll review this
and decide what to do.

Scott




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?445D53C1.90601>