Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 23:16:15 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Mike Smith <msmith@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Michael VanLoon <MichaelV@EDIFECS.COM>, "'hardware@freebsd.org'" <hardware@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: SCSI vs. IDE -- IBM's take Message-ID: <10043.994367775@critter> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 05 Jul 2001 14:27:01 PDT." <200107052127.f65LR1901620@mass.dis.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200107052127.f65LR1901620@mass.dis.org>, Mike Smith writes: >> Yet more on this subject... >> >> I thought this was interesting because IBM is widely considered to make the >> best IDE drives in the market right now. >> >> http://www.storage.ibm.com/techsup/hddtech/ide_raid.htm > >This reads like a lot of FUD; I'd be embarrassed to be associated with >producing something like this... Considering the margins on SCSI devices, I would be defending my bottom line too... The one crucial bit they leave out is what the 'I' in RAID means :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?10043.994367775>