Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:37:33 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt@mac.com> Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@FreeBSD.org>, FreeBSD current mailing list <current@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: boot0cfg -s vs. GEOM_PART_*? Message-ID: <16288.1234906653@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:15:55 PST." <D29A6039-5105-49CB-B613-DD561CDD1A89@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <D29A6039-5105-49CB-B613-DD561CDD1A89@mac.com>, Marcel Moolenaar wri tes: >For boot0cfg this is probably acceptable, because >it only operates on MBRs. But as a generic solution >this won't work. Then pick up the bootcode via ioctls, it does not belong in the confxml sysctl. Poul-Henning -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16288.1234906653>