Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 17:50:06 +0200 From: "Uzi" <uzi@bmby.com> To: "David Sze" <dsze@alumni.uwaterloo.ca> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux Message-ID: <005c01c57354$3e877900$fe00a8c0@uzi> References: <6.2.1.2.2.20050617103807.058c6fa8@mail.distrust.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[...] > super-smack select-key > 5.4-RELEASE ~20,000 queries/second > 6.0-CURRENT ~24,000 queries/second > CentOS w/async ~36,000 queries/second > CentOS w/sync ~26,000 queries/second > > super-smack update-select > 5.4-RELEASE ~4,000 queries/second > 6.0-CURRENT ~4,500 queries/second > CentOS w/async ~7,500 queries/second > CentOS w/sync ~750 queries/second > > That last CentOS number is not a typo, it was an order of magnitude > slower. I didn't try other file systems on CentOS, just the default ext3. > It's possible that reiserfs or xfs might not be as affected by switching > from async to sync. > > So my production server is now happily running mysql 4.1 on 6.0-CURRENT > :). I don't get it. You get 30% less perfomance, running a non-production release for production, and happy about it? U. > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?005c01c57354$3e877900$fe00a8c0>