Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 15:17:38 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Vasenin Alexander aka BlackSir <blacksir@number.ru> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: RE: ng_netflow: testers are welcome Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0402221516560.52329-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <NKEJKOHEKMBIMCCEHEPKGEOFCEAA.blacksir@number.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
you can open a divert socket as a netgraph node by openning a ksocket node with protocol 'divert'. On Sun, 22 Feb 2004, Vasenin Alexander aka BlackSir wrote: > Yep... But it not so obvious for man like me, who thought just a week ago > that netgraph is something beetween net & graphics... like MRTG > LOL > > Another question: > Is is possible that ng_netflow take packets _after_ they are diverted by > natd? I apologise, that this would require divert implemented as netgraph > node? So... I have no idea how this would work with ipfw ruleset... Any > ideas? > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org > > [mailto:owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Gleb Smirnoff > > Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2004 2:58 AM > > To: Julian Elischer > > Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Bjoern A. Zeeb; Vasenin Alexander aka > > BlackSir; freebsd-net@freebsd.org > > Subject: Re: ng_netflow: testers are welcome > > > Is it possible to make port dependant on kernel module > > shipped with base system? How? > > For example sysutils/ips is not dependant on ipfw. It is obvious > > that ipfw is required for it, as well as in case of netgraph > > and ng_netflow. > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0402221516560.52329-100000>