Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1998 18:57:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Alex <garbanzo@hooked.net> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@www.hotjobs.com> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, support@yard.de Subject: Re: Linux vs FreeBSD (performances) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.00.9808201855570.236-100000@zippy.dyn.ml.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980820162453.305G-100000@bright.fx.genx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 20 Aug 1998, Alfred Perlstein wrote: [...] > urm > > FreeBSD bright.x 3.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT #7: Sun Aug 16 > 22:05:13 EST 1998 > bright@bright.x:/usr/src/sys/compile/bright i386 > > Linux poopie 2.1.76 #8 Sun Jan 18 03:42:15 EST 1998 i686 unknown > > that's the kernels, btw, about your previous post, every linux user i've > talked to says the NFS is userland. you are sure about it being in > kernel? Well, I'z just saying, be sure to compare 2.1.xx to -current, as RH 5.1, despite it's obvious lack of stable code, still ships with a 2.x.x kernel for the x86 platform anyways. My previous post? This is my second post in this thread. - alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.00.9808201855570.236-100000>