Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 31 May 2011 15:16:05 -0700
From:      mdf@FreeBSD.org
To:        "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@freebsd.org>
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r222537 - in head/sys: kern sys
Message-ID:  <BANLkTimh=ND77iP95dTR0ZaXJJCBFATQuQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110531221122.GA58836@nargothrond.kdm.org>
References:  <201105311729.p4VHTwrZ033296@svn.freebsd.org> <BANLkTim1AQQj1BfqHtYfPWrvaQBp41qDNw@mail.gmail.com> <20110531214618.GA57498@nargothrond.kdm.org> <BANLkTinThaAeP9cAVpoGxpSNq2zn%2Ba-P6Q@mail.gmail.com> <20110531221122.GA58836@nargothrond.kdm.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Kenneth D. Merry <ken@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 15:02:37 -0700, mdf@FreeBSD.org wrote:
>> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Kenneth D. Merry <ken@freebsd.org> wrot=
e:
>> > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 14:00:18 -0700, mdf@FreeBSD.org wrote:
>> >> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Kenneth D. Merry <ken@freebsd.org> =
wrote:
>> >> > Author: ken
>> >> > Date: Tue May 31 17:29:58 2011
>> >> > New Revision: 222537
>> >> > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/222537
>> >> >
>> >> > Log:
>> >> > ?Fix apparent garbage in the message buffer.
>> >> >
>> >> > ?While we have had a fix in place (options PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE=3D128) =
to fix
>> >> > ?scrambled console output, the message buffer and syslog were still=
 getting
>> >> > ?log messages one character at a time. ?While all of the characters=
 still
>> >> > ?made it into the log (courtesy of atomic operations), they were of=
ten
>> >> > ?interleaved when there were multiple threads writing to the buffer=
 at the
>> >> > ?same time.
>> >>
>> >> This seems to panic my box with "lock "msgbuf" 0xfffffe0127ffffe0
>> >> already initialized".
>> >>
>> >> Unfortunately, though I booted with a fresh CURRENT this morning
>> >> successfully, both /boot/kernel and /boot/kernel.old give this panic.
>> >> To add insult to injury, when the kernel drops into the debugger, my
>> >> keyboard input no longer works so I can't get a stack, etc.
>> >
>> > Uh-oh!
>> >
>> >> So:
>> >>
>> >> 1) Is there anything else I can do to help debug this?
>> >> 2) how can I resurrect this box without a reinstall?
>> >>
>> >> I will try to repro on a virtual machine so I have a snapshot to come=
 back to.
>> >
>> > My guess is that this is an issue with the message buffer reinitializa=
tion
>> > path. ?lock_init() (called by mtx_init()) has an assert to make sure t=
hat
>> > the lock is initialized, and that is just a flag check.
>> >
>> > Since the spin lock is part of the message buffer structure, if it is =
held
>> > over from a previous boot, the LO_INITIALIZED flag may still be set.
>> >
>> > Try power cycling the machine. ?If it is an issue with re-initializati=
on,
>> > that should clear the memory and allow you to boot.
>>
>> Hmm, apparently my previous presses of the power button weren't long
>> enough. =A0I let it sit off for 20 seconds and it boots okay now.
>
> Okay, so it probably is the re-initialization code. =A0Can you try this p=
atch
> and see if it survives a warm boot? =A0I also changed the initialization
> path, so we don't get tripped up by garbage left in memory.

This patch survived a warm reboot (shutdown -r now).

> Also, does the debugger work now that it has booted successfully?

The debugger (or rather, my keyboard in the debugger) works on a
successful boot.  I used sysctl debug.kdb.enter=3D1 to test it.

Thanks,
matthew



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BANLkTimh=ND77iP95dTR0ZaXJJCBFATQuQ>