Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 23:56:53 -0700 From: "Amancio Hasty Jr." <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> To: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@plains.nodak.edu> Cc: multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 30fps with vic? Message-ID: <199604250656.XAA00413@rah.star-gate.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 24 Apr 1996 09:05:35 CDT." <199604241405.JAA00245@plains.nodak.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>> Mark Tinguely said:
> > > From: "Amancio Hasty Jr." <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
> > >
> > > Say has anyone managed to get 30fps with CIF geometry (352x288) ?
> > >
> > > Tnks,
> > > Amancio
> > >
> > From: "Jim Lowe" <james@miller.cs.uwm.edu>
> > Sure, if I point my camera at a wall I get 30fps, 40kbps, in h.261 mode
> > with vic. If I just do raw frame captures I can get 640x480x4x30fps.
> >
> > -Jim
>
> Yep, the compression of moving images causes the lower frame rate and increa
sed
> bandwidth. Because of this, IMHO, full quality video will require the
> compression to be done on the capture board. for internet use, we probably
> would want only MPEG 1 quality, but leased/wider bandwidth networks will use
> MPEG 2. unfortunately, MPEG 2 capture boards are very expensive ($4-5K).
Hi,
My next question is: has anyone done a profile analysis on vic / h.261 to
see if vic's performance can be improved?
Tnks,
Amancio
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199604250656.XAA00413>