Date: 29 Apr 2000 13:39:50 +0200 From: Assar Westerlund <assar@sics.se> To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: How about building modules along with the kernel? (was: cvs commit: src/sys/modules/syscons/fire fire_saver.c src/sys/modules/syscons/rain rain_saver.c src/sys/modules/syscons/warp warp_saver.c) Message-ID: <5l1z3pw2yh.fsf@assaris.sics.se> In-Reply-To: owner-cvs-all-digest@FreeBSD.ORG's message of "Sat, 29 Apr 2000 04:21:53 -0700 (PDT)" References: <bulk.40403.20000429042152@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 13:57:49 +0930 > From: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> > Subject: Re: How about building modules along with the kernel? (was: cvs commit: src/sys/modules/syscons/fire fire_saver.c src/sys/modules/syscons/rain rain_saver.c src/sys/modules/syscons/warp warp_saver.c) > > On Friday, 28 April 2000 at 22:57:08 -0400, Chuck Robey wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Greg Lehey wrote: > > > >>> Tell you what. Let the discussion carry on. If there's no movement > >>> by Friday, I'll stick the offer back up. I just want to insure that > >>> it doesn't die (again) by being stuck onto a proposal for too grand > >>> a design. > >> > >> Sounds good. How about: if nobody comes up with any objections by > >> Friday, just do it? I suppose there will be fewer objections if the > >> defaults don't change very much. > > > > This still a go (I'm behind on my email, won't catch up until > > tomorrow)? > > Nobody has killed it yet. Well, I've raised objections, but I'm just a simple KLD-writer. I would prefer for this (your original points 1-4) not to be implemented without anyone having considered what I had to say. Comments? /assar To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5l1z3pw2yh.fsf>