Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 12:29:40 -0500 From: Chris Csanady <ccsanady@nyx.pr.mcs.net> To: Ben Black <black@zen.cypher.net> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unloading LKMs (was Re: A Desparate Plea for Help...) Message-ID: <199704301729.MAA23345@nyx.pr.mcs.net> In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 30 Apr 1997 12:41:50 -0400. <Pine.LNX.3.91.970430124137.32333A-100000@zen.cypher.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>welcome to solaris. Are you implying that this is a *bad* thing? >On Wed, 30 Apr 1997, Chris Csanady wrote: > >> >> >The important point is that there is *no difference* between the dynamic >> >and statically loaded version of a driver. I can go into a >> >/sys/compile/FOO directory and construct loadable modules from the same >> >object files. >> >> How about a statically loaded version of the kernel? I mean, will it now >> be nothing more than an aggregate of some modules? It would be nice if >> all there were were modules, and to make yourself a kernel, you just >> had to stick them together.. >> >> --Chris Csanady >> >> >-- >> >Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com >> >Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 181 951 1891 >> > >> >> >>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704301729.MAA23345>