Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:56:48 +0400 From: Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org> To: cvs-src@yandex.ru Cc: ruby@FreeBSD.org, Renato Botelho <garga@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: rmagick duplicate port Message-ID: <20090622185648.039dda82.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <56301245681848@webmail48.yandex.ru>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:44:08 +0400 cvs-src@yandex.ru mentioned: > Good day! > > Seems like we now have two identical ports: > > graphics/ruby-rmagickššššššššš --> 2.9.2 > graphics/rubygem-rmagickššš --> 2.10.0 > > first installed from tarball, another one - from gem. Is this ok? > Not at all. This provides the same functionality as ruby-rmagick, although providing no ability to tweak installation options being limited by what gems packet manager provides. -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJKP5uwAAoJEKN82nOYvCd071wP/1sgJ7kDe4dF2cs4aY3IRNsQ lQHy2HoI/RswIHQ3sjQl9LQ5V2/1+V90uKP5dma9vGuXjXqH+/1WXDz+jM2xO3LR EYWnAIBN/n2InT85Ii5rOVrKcDcqZD1uZIqpUATPDNWDy4NK9iO/+edsOLfCMA6B BCilOIV8wcwRL++CuaJ0qXfhupKq7LovX7vG4zH5TVwcWdSMaUgXpTSOQjZ7FG+g KXH3Sy3qiYSlqsOibQVjn+TF52W3P3yaS2P99Mx1Wbu57yraWsRWeHHMozDg9kL9 Uvhjdl+Y0mP1inOBNrBzB+rfUtjkSsBhfrep75I+4PPC9vvJinuccH+53fMz7jNZ Gph53+8XX+GnMj/+tPQd7l6oNXWfotGjdRCYCF+o872vl6kMaCLZDknvwBCY6Vbf JeSDEJqG6OCiTaBqgXajlUC5RIfljT7oEQX9gYUZCxWT0nZRYDPiZr9wNOn+s0Iw n8cLnoadEq3GAU2nPTkyV1p5YU8ISs/JXXytPWZE4s9RJi6jOZl8tP187VMKRSKB Hlb5b2YUCBSbAxueGO3z6JBzad+ybXbuNFR4IqPBUGnNBwZKSZeGIFr+9QwAFPPU dFfz62fMZF16iwYdXaObW/LtohZ7VNazQfR4ziZ6nr8X/bbtbDnikKnefCDULNK4 GMf/u3BYwPzv3073y0tX =8dPy -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090622185648.039dda82.stas>