Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 13:38:41 +0100 From: John Marino <freebsdml@marino.st> To: lev@FreeBSD.org, Royce Williams <royce@tycho.org> Cc: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com>, FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Removing documentation Message-ID: <56BDD251.40207@marino.st> In-Reply-To: <56BDCF5D.5020101@FreeBSD.org> References: <56B754A8.3030605@marino.st> <56BCE01D.4010701@FreeBSD.org> <56BCE218.40403@marino.st> <CA%2BE3k93iYs1p5Je-AKwJ7pVLdzYgSXWqb4P0XoD0oTJhrkt==Q@mail.gmail.com> <56BCEC5F.4020007@marino.st> <CA%2BE3k930YfN=LADkE7X4a82RSPZ-MSeKkC=U_J8kKDiy6vot=w@mail.gmail.com> <56BDCF5D.5020101@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2/12/2016 1:26 PM, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 12.02.2016 03:22, Royce Williams wrote: > >> As long as the ports system exists (and I think it should!), the >> management of compilation requirements -- especially for something >> that might need to be bootstrapped early, like a software >> management tool -- is a valid topic. > THIS. What "This"? He was wrong. There's no bootstrapping. It doesn't apply. You are "thumbs up"ing a fallacy. It makes no sense at all. I am sure is sounds great though.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?56BDD251.40207>