Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1997 23:47:06 -0700 (MST) From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net> Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, hackers@freebsd.org, terry@lambert.org Subject: Re: Terry Message-ID: <199701220647.XAA24362@rocky.mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <l03010d03af0b2240fcc6@[208.2.87.3]> References: <199701212037.NAA19913@phaeton.artisoft.com> <19361.853887384@time.cdrom.com> <l03010d03af0b2240fcc6@[208.2.87.3]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I do not take it lightly. As for "explaining it", I have REPEATEDLY been > told that the ONLY acceptable "explanation" is a FULLY working > implementation. These people do not seem to grasp conceptual designs. > Instead they are stuck at the "nuts and bolts" level. And I'll again remind you that I volunteerED (note the past tense) to work with you on building the next generation system *months* ago if you could show me a working prototype. I *never* received a reply from you accepting/rejecting the offer, so my offer was withdrawn after 2 months of waiting with nothing to show for. I'm not going to commit my time for something that simply isn't going to occur because of yet another excuse. I was willing to work with you and yet when you had what you publically asked for you still refused to do anything. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199701220647.XAA24362>