Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 13:20:09 -0400 From: "Brian A. Seklecki" <bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com> To: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> Cc: Frank Bonnet <f.bonnet@esiee.fr>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bondbind like for FreeBSD ? Message-ID: <1182878409.67654.61.camel@soundwave.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <20070626153618.GG6494@dan.emsphone.com> References: <46812FE9.2050104@esiee.fr> <20070626153618.GG6494@dan.emsphone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 10:36 -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: > > ethernet load balancing or trunking that use the Cisco's > > etherchannel ) ? > Very cool. Two questions: 1) "fec" and "lacp" must be used against the same physical switch, correct? 2) What is the deterministic logic behind active/standby for "failover"? A heartbeat on the segment or physical interface state change? TIA, ~BAS > You can use the lagg device in 6-stable and -current; if you're > running > 6.2 or older you can use ng_fec or ng_one2many, but they both use > static configuration and aren't as nice. -- Brian A. Seklecki <bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com> Collaborative Fusion, Inc. IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient (or the individual responsible for the delivery of this message to an intended recipient), please be advised that any re-use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is prohibited. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1182878409.67654.61.camel>