Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 19:40:11 GMT From: Rene Ladan <r.c.ladan@gmail.com> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/113099: [PATCH] sysutils/libchk may skip $X11BASE now Message-ID: <200705281940.l4SJeB5k034409@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/113099; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Rene Ladan <r.c.ladan@gmail.com> To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/113099: [PATCH] sysutils/libchk may skip $X11BASE now Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 21:18:02 +0200 Edwin Groothuis wrote: > Maintainer of sysutils/libchk, > > Please note that PR ports/113099 has just been submitted. > > If it contains a patch for an upgrade, an enhancement or a bug fix > you agree on, reply to this email stating that you approve the patch > and a committer will take care of it. > > The full text of the PR can be found at: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/113099 > According to ${PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.port.mk, ${X11BASE} now _defaults_ to ${LOCALBASE}, but users can still choose to set ${X11BASE} to another directory than ${LOCALBASE} when USE_NONDEFAULT_X11BASE is set (on my box they're the same} I'm cc'ing x11@ to get some general consensus. -- GPG fingerprint = E738 5471 D185 7013 0EE0 4FC8 3C1D 6F83 12E1 84F6 (subkeys.pgp.net) "It won't fit on the line." -- me, 2001
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200705281940.l4SJeB5k034409>