Date: Mon, 1 Jul 1996 12:42:33 -0600 (MDT) From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: compile_et & mk_cmds? Message-ID: <199607011842.MAA10492@rocky.mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <9607011827.AA09845@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> References: <199607010418.WAA08199@rocky.mt.sri.com> <9607011827.AA09845@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> > Could compile_et be moved to eBones, > > Erm, why? It's a general-purpose utility/library, used by many libraries > developed at MIT. Is it used at all by FreeBSD? > > and what is the purpose of mk_cmds? > > It generates a command table for the `subsystem' library (libss), for > which the same comment applies. I would like to replace it with > something a little more modern (probably tcl), but this will take some > time and work that I'm not prepared to spend right now. Is it used by *anything* in FreeBSD? If not, why do we have it? We recently moved out libforms since it wasn't used, so the same arguement should apply to libss. Natehome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199607011842.MAA10492>