Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 11:51:47 -0500 From: Joe Maloney <jmaloney@pcbsd.org> To: Eric McCorkle <eric@metricspace.net> Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: EFI/ZFS Update: successful tests, need more complex vdevs Message-ID: <21B8A793-CAC2-4A8F-9B31-BC8DA9ED29A9@pcbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <56211825.3080403@metricspace.net> References: <56211825.3080403@metricspace.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Hi Eric, PCBSD is using your patch in it’s latest October image, and it’s working great. NextBSD has it as well. Joe Maloney > On Oct 16, 2015, at 10:30 AM, Eric McCorkle <eric@metricspace.net> wrote: > > Hi, > > I've received a few successful test reports for EFI/ZFS, on both ZFS and UFS systems. I have personally been using it for some time in a GRUB + loader.efi setup. > > I have a fairly minor test result for loader.efi. I have confirmed that "nextboot -k" works fine. > > In general, I need testing on ZFS setups with more complex vdevs (l2arc, intent logs, mirroring, striping, raidz, etc.) > > I myself have a new raidz pool I can use (it's running FreeBSD 10, though, so I'll need to backport the patch). I've also got some laptops coming that I can use. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?21B8A793-CAC2-4A8F-9B31-BC8DA9ED29A9>