Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 12:32:10 -0700 From: Navdeep Parhar <nparhar@gmail.com> To: John Jasen <jjasen@gmail.com> Cc: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>, "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, "Caraballo-vega, Jordan A." <jordancaraballo87@gmail.com> Subject: Re: bad throughput performance on multiple systems: Re: Fwd: Re: Disappointing packets-per-second performance results on a Dell,PE R530 Message-ID: <CAPFoGT8C1%2BZYDSFVGjCuT8v5%2B=izfXgHXEn5P2dqxAq6N6ypCA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9924b2d5-4a72-579c-96c6-4dbdacc07c95@gmail.com> References: <7d349edd-0c81-2e3f-d3b9-27af232de76d@gmail.com> <20170209153409.GG41673@dwarf> <6ad029e0-86c6-af3d-8fc3-694d4bcdc683@gmail.com> <b460cc49-364a-34fb-e212-582730546dee@gmail.com> <20170312231826.GV15630@zxy.spb.ru> <74654520-b8b6-6118-2e46-902a8ea107ac@gmail.com> <CAPFoGT9k4HfDCQ7wJPDFMTrJTtDyc9uK_ma9ubneDhVSsS-jcA@mail.gmail.com> <173fffac-7ae2-786a-66c0-e9cd7ab78f44@gmail.com> <CAPFoGT-BAMpj34wtB06dxMKk%2B87OEOs5-qu%2BRLVz=aPrhX6hDA@mail.gmail.com> <CAACLuR29xQhDWATRheBaOU2vtiYp61JgDKHaXum%2BU32MBDLBzw@mail.gmail.com> <20170317100814.GN70430@zxy.spb.ru> <9924b2d5-4a72-579c-96c6-4dbdacc07c95@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 12:21 PM, John Jasen <jjasen@gmail.com> wrote: > On 03/17/2017 06:08 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 03:50:42PM -0400, John Jasen wrote: >> >>> As a few points of note, partial resolution, and curiosity: >>> >>> Following down leads that 11-STABLE had tryforward improvements over >>> 11-RELENG, I upgraded. The same tests (24 client streams over UDP with >>> small packets), the system went from passing 1.7m pps to about 2.5m. >>> >>> Following indications from Navdeep Parhar that UDP queue hashing is not as >>> efficient as it could be, we started running the tests with various powers >>> of 2 streams (2,4,8,16,32) -- and were able to push the system up to 5m pps. >>> >>> We are currently seeing in the tests approximately 10-11m pps on the >>> outside interface, around 5-6m dropped, and 5 million passed. >> You want more? > > Yes. > > We were hopeful, initially, to be able to achieve higher packet > forwarding rates through either netmap-fwd or due to enhancements based > off https://wiki.freebsd.org/ProjectsRoutingProposal Have you tried netmap-fwd? I'd be interested in how that did in your tests. Sadly, projects/routing couldn't make it into 11. I'm trying to find out what's keeping it from getting merged into head. Regards, Navdeep
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPFoGT8C1%2BZYDSFVGjCuT8v5%2B=izfXgHXEn5P2dqxAq6N6ypCA>