Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 22:20:09 +0200 From: Maciej Freudenheim <fahren@student.uci.agh.edu.pl> To: threads@freebsd.org Subject: Call for thread testers: XMMS Message-ID: <20030827202009.GA44225@piggie>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello!
I was tuning xmms some time ago. Now i'm running it linked with libthr
for about 2 weeks and i haven't observed any problems.
Here are few numbers:
libc_r.so.5 =3D> /usr/lib/libc_r.so.5 (0x28336000)
45197 fahren 98 0 17984K 14708K select 0:46 3.08% 3.08% xmms
libc_r.so.5 =3D> /usr/lib/libkse.so.1 (0x28336000)
45261 fahren 98 0 17236K 14384K select 0:11 2.80% 2.78% xmms
libc_r.so.5 =3D> /usr/lib/libthr.so.1 (0x28336000)
45347 fahren 97 0 17236K 14384K select 0:10 2.41% 2.39% xmms
The tests were all done of course on the same version of xmms (cvs from=20
Tue Aug 12 2003) with the same settings and playing the same mp3 file=20
('dream of mirrors' :)
OS version was FreeBSD-current from Aug 23.
So,
> Does it work with libkse and libthr=20
Yes.
> Does it operate correctly
Yes.
> Does it perform better/worse than with libc_r
Better. 1:1 libthr is the winner.
> Does it perform better/worse than under FreeBSD 4.x=20
Much better. Xmms is eating about 10% cpu on the same machine with FreeBSD
4.x.
Hope it is useful to somebody :)
fahren.
--1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE/TRJ5iZPiEPhhqGARAtMgAJ92QXoqavxQoKV+BOTEBfid6GJ9lACgst56
AbNZTovgCMaHKw+tGcA8QLg=
=75bn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030827202009.GA44225>