Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 22:20:09 +0200 From: Maciej Freudenheim <fahren@student.uci.agh.edu.pl> To: threads@freebsd.org Subject: Call for thread testers: XMMS Message-ID: <20030827202009.GA44225@piggie>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --]
Hello!
I was tuning xmms some time ago. Now i'm running it linked with libthr
for about 2 weeks and i haven't observed any problems.
Here are few numbers:
libc_r.so.5 => /usr/lib/libc_r.so.5 (0x28336000)
45197 fahren 98 0 17984K 14708K select 0:46 3.08% 3.08% xmms
libc_r.so.5 => /usr/lib/libkse.so.1 (0x28336000)
45261 fahren 98 0 17236K 14384K select 0:11 2.80% 2.78% xmms
libc_r.so.5 => /usr/lib/libthr.so.1 (0x28336000)
45347 fahren 97 0 17236K 14384K select 0:10 2.41% 2.39% xmms
The tests were all done of course on the same version of xmms (cvs from
Tue Aug 12 2003) with the same settings and playing the same mp3 file
('dream of mirrors' :)
OS version was FreeBSD-current from Aug 23.
So,
> Does it work with libkse and libthr
Yes.
> Does it operate correctly
Yes.
> Does it perform better/worse than with libc_r
Better. 1:1 libthr is the winner.
> Does it perform better/worse than under FreeBSD 4.x
Much better. Xmms is eating about 10% cpu on the same machine with FreeBSD
4.x.
Hope it is useful to somebody :)
fahren.
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE/TRJ5iZPiEPhhqGARAtMgAJ92QXoqavxQoKV+BOTEBfid6GJ9lACgst56
AbNZTovgCMaHKw+tGcA8QLg=
=75bn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030827202009.GA44225>