Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2000 23:32:52 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> To: Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira <lioux@uol.com.br> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sysutils/memtest and FreeBSD Message-ID: <397B0214.46379EE6@newsguy.com> References: <20000721175757.B319@Fedaykin.here> <3979B777.A8AD8511@newsguy.com> <20000722181330.A404@Fedaykin.here>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote: > > Besides, a failing malloc should return NULL, shouldn't > it? I would have expected core if I had malloc_options="X" which > I do not (in fact, I have no malloc_options). IF the malloc fails, it should return NULL. But this only happens in the case of artificial limits. > ps: Perhaps you could check the code, it is only 11K long. Sure, send it. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org capo@white.bunnies.bsdconspiracy.net Satan was once an angel, Gates started by writing a BASIC interpreter. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?397B0214.46379EE6>