Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 11:54:23 +0200 (CEST) From: "KlaymenDK" <jan+freebsd@g-b.dk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: State of 3d video, which vendor has best support? Message-ID: <51716.195.212.29.83.1220954063.squirrel@webmail.g-b.dk>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<quote who="John Nielsen">
> On Monday 08 September 2008, KlaymenDK wrote:
>> I'm about to build a new pc, the first in quite a few years. My problem
>> is that I can't find out if I should choose a 3D chipset from Intel, Ati,
>> or nVidia. What's the state of support, track record, and such for these
>> nowadays?
>
> This is becoming a FAQ. You should be able to find some good information
> in a couple of relatively recent threads.
>
> The nutshell summary (in my opinion, from memory) is this:
> * nVidia support is good w/ the binary driver on i386.
> Not available on amd64.
> * ati support is great for hardware supported by radeon(4x).
> The manpage has a pretty good list. Better support for fancier cards
> ("hd", etc) is coming but not quite all the way there.
> * intel support is very good. Not quite as many souped-up options but
> modern onboard intel graphics are more than adequate for almost
> anything, including many games.
That's excellent!
Believe you me, I've done rather a lot of googling, but it's tricky to
come up with the right mix of keywords to not be flooded with wrong results.
Thank you so very much! FYI, I will buy a (Sapphire?) Radeon HD3850, because
it has dual DVI out and *very* low idle power draw. I shall have to take my
chances with the "not quite all the way there" HD support.
:o) KlaymenDK
-- 010\001\111 --
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51716.195.212.29.83.1220954063.squirrel>