Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 23:54:48 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 264136] security/py-paramiko: 2.11.0 added hard dependency on security/py-gssapi Message-ID: <bug-264136-21822-DlMKkoKK4A@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-264136-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-264136-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D264136 --- Comment #2 from John W. O'Brien <john@saltant.com> --- By inspection, I conclude that "gssapi" is defined as a setuptools "extra", which is what should pull in the pyasn1 and gssapi optional dependencies. I would propose A) naming the new option after the upstream-defined extra (e.= g. GSSAPI); and B) moving the devel/py-pyasn1 dependency under that option in addition to the security/py-gssapi dependency. As an aside, if base is built WITHOUT_KERBEROS, a GSSAPI feature can still = be satisfied in general via ports using GSSAPI_HEIMDAL or GSSAPI_MIT. As far a= s I know, it is still up to the base builder to coordinate with the ports build= er to ensure that the options each employs are compatible. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-264136-21822-DlMKkoKK4A>