Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:32:38 -0800 From: "Dana H. Myers" <dana.myers@gmail.com> To: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> Cc: Alexander Motin <mav@freebsd.org>, freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org, freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org, martinko <gamato@users.sf.net> Subject: Re: Is the C3 possible with SMP? Message-ID: <49277D56.7030202@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20081122130515.K70117@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20081121195714.CEE4B45010@ptavv.es.net> <20081122113015.B70117@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <492763E6.1080808@gmail.com> <20081122130515.K70117@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ian Smith wrote: > > While I suspect the value is indeed Watts, I do not know > > why you're thinking 36A would indicate 400W or more. Modern > > CPUs typically run at relatively low voltages between 1.0V > > and 1.6V and proportionately high current. > > Unless acpiconf -i has changed between 7.0 and now, it reports Present > Rate in mW, at least when running on battery. My T23 right now reports > that as 13447mW, ie 13.447W. With a present battery voltage of 12.247V, > that'd be 1.097 Amps battery discharge. YMMV. Ah - my error. acpiconf -i reports on the battery, not the CPU. For some reason I was thinking that we were discussing CPU power consumption. My apologies. Dana
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49277D56.7030202>