Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 22:54:28 -0800 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> To: jhell <jhell@DataIX.net> Cc: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-8@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r218695 - stable/8/usr.bin/top Message-ID: <xeia4o84fp0b.fsf@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1102152358240.1863@qvfongpu.qngnvk.ybpny> (jhell@dataix.net's message of "Wed, 16 Feb 2011 00:06:39 -0500") References: <201102150633.p1F6XZrT020272@svn.freebsd.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1102152358240.1863@qvfongpu.qngnvk.ybpny>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 00:06:39 -0500, jhell <jhell@DataIX.net> wrote: > On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 01:33, keramida@ wrote: >> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/218695 >> >> MFC 217746 from /head/usr.bin/top >> >> Touch up the sample memory usage numbers a bit, to avoid wrapping >> on terminal boundary. While here add definition for 'G' and fix >> the indentation of 'K' units. .. >> -.SH DESCRIPTION OF MEMORY >> -Mem: 9220K Active, 1032K Inact, 3284K Wired, 1M Cache, 2M Buf, 1320K Free >> +.SH DESCRIPTION OF MEMORY >> +Mem: 9220K Active, 1M Inact, 3284K Wired, 1M Cache, 2M Buf, 1320K Free >> Swap: 91M Total, 79M Free, 13% Inuse, 80K In, 104K Out > > Maybe being a little picky here but consistency in this might persuade > further questions on why Active is using K but yet Inact "being > smaller" than that is using M. > > Might be best to just take some active values straight from a running > top(1) output rather than blindly adjusting them. On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:50:30 +0300, Sergey Kandaurov <pluknet@freebsd.org> wrote: > Well, that was already broken before the change. It's still not too late to do that. I'll replace the Mem: line with one from my current installation: Mem: 18M Active, 298M Inact, 119M Wired, 220K Cache, 110M Buf, 553M Free Does that look better?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xeia4o84fp0b.fsf>