Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 13:09:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com> To: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libpthread patch Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10304161303230.20812-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10304161219510.14483-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 16 Apr 2003, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Wed, 16 Apr 2003, David Xu wrote: > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Daniel Eischen" <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com> > > To: "David Xu" <davidxu@freebsd.org> > > Cc: <freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>; ""Craig Rodrigues"" <rodrigc@attbi.com> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 10:58 AM > > Subject: Re: libpthread patch > > > > > I thought it might also be the UTS trying to interrupt > > > the thread (kse_thr_interruot) while it was in the kernel > > > (assuming the UTS did get the signal). > > > > Can you try a patch for kern_exit.c ? > > http://people.freebsd.org/~davidxu/kern_exit.c.diff Found it! The library's version of sigaction was not allowing a signal handler for SIGCHLD to be installed; it was leftover from libc_r. Process_Manager_Test now passes. The only test that doesn't pass now is Cached_Conn_Test. This is with your kernel (kern_exit.c.diff) patch applied. I have not tried it without your patch. I'll do some more testing and post an updated patch. -- Dan Eischen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10304161303230.20812-100000>