Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 02:41:36 +0200 (CEST) From: Michael Reifenberger <mike@Reifenberger.com> To: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: _<service> users [Was: startup error for pflogd] Message-ID: <20040622023829.G11925@fw.reifenberger.com> In-Reply-To: <200406220157.02776.max@love2party.net> References: <20040620134437.P94503@fw.reifenberger.com> <20040621164657.GA2544@dragon.nuxi.com> <200406220157.02776.max@love2party.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Max Laier wrote:
...
> Okay, let's talk about this then: Any strong optionions one way or the other?
>
> I think this is a bikeshed. There is no technical argument (to my knowledge)
> that suggests either. My vote is for "_<service>" to keep the diff down, but
> that is not an argument of course. Others have said that it:
> - helps to recognize system processes
> - helps to see "bad things" happening (1000 _pflogd is not a good sign)
> - resolves possible namespace problems
>
One technical argument could be that _<service> users would look like
RFC2782 DNS-SRV entries.
Bye/2
---
Michael Reifenberger, Business Development Manager SAP-Basis, Plaut Consulting
Comp: Michael.Reifenberger@plaut.de | Priv: Michael@Reifenberger.com
http://www.plaut.de | http://www.Reifenberger.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040622023829.G11925>