Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 13:44:20 +0100 (CET) From: Andy Georges <ageorges@twizors.rug.ac.be> To: Thomas Uhrfelt <thomas.uhrfelt@plymovent.se> Cc: "'Richard Wackerbarth'" <rkw@dataplex.net>, "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: SV: Voxware is toast. Get used to it. (Re: Suggestions for impro Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10003221341180.2358-100000@twizors.rug.ac.be> In-Reply-To: <01BF93FE.6BFBBEE0.thomas.uhrfelt@plymovent.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > "-RELEASE" is not a state. It is a point in time. > > The other terms refer to the continuum between releases. i used to have some problems understanding the difference between -STABLE and -RELEASE but i think this points it out nicely > I have no religious views at all on the subject, so either way is fine by > me. The reason why it's called CURRENT I belive is due to the fact thats > where the focal point on the project is. New things gets adopted and > basically - that's where FreeBSD is, not neccessarily the users. -CURRENT looks like a good name to me, but one should still inform new users that it's the edge. Once you have read that in the handbook or someplace else, i feel you know enough to decide with what you'll go. -- zors To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.10003221341180.2358-100000>