Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 10:11:13 +0100 From: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk> To: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> Cc: chris@FreeBSD.ORG, Eric Melville <eric@FreeBSD.ORG>, Murray Stokely <murray@FreeBSD.ORG>, binup@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Who else is on this list? Message-ID: <20011017101113.C742@tao.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <3BCC9F66.CF6F03B7@tenebras.com>; from kudzu@tenebras.com on Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 01:58:14PM -0700 References: <20011016192418.O83396@tao.org.uk> <20011016155244.C6252@holly.calldei.com> <3BCC9F66.CF6F03B7@tenebras.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--0lnxQi9hkpPO77W3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 01:58:14PM -0700, Michael Sierchio wrote: >=20 > I'm here. My interest, as I tried to articulate in a previous post, > is to develop some kind of trusted mechanism with strong authenticators > for binary updates with a high degree of granularity. >=20 > I don't think the package mechanism will work. I don't think that the existing package framework will work, but if we get the pkgAPI right there would be nothing stopping someone from writing a new package module for it for dealing with binary upgrades. Joe --0lnxQi9hkpPO77W3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjvNSzEACgkQXVIcjOaxUBZBtgCgiY9jUGQV2YJFxyKCcEYzMpf8 lrYAoN/ZPEkS1WTw8wneCV8KDLDMHFGY =/35u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0lnxQi9hkpPO77W3-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-binup" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011017101113.C742>