Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 09:58:42 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt@mac.com> To: Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nslookup dumps core on ia64 HEAD Message-ID: <C6A68F32-67C9-4CC2-A7D0-AD2B2EBBA9B8@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <20091129131443.GA7194@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20091126091456.GA93898@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <7A71CC85-4189-405A-BD9E-5BFF2C04D5C2@mac.com> <20091127102200.GB3108@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <0DBED408-D602-4333-BEF6-FC0DA700730D@mac.com> <20091129131443.GA7194@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 29, 2009, at 5:14 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >> % sudo make install > > I did just exactly what you wrote, but not sure I got there, because > nslookup is still dated 2 weeks ago: > >> ls -al /usr/bin/nslookup > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 3568440 13 Nov 16:16 /usr/bin/nslookup If you don't have sudo installed from ports, then the install fails. You don't have to install sudo, just run the command as root. > and the results are mixed: sometimes it works, and sometimes it > doesn't: This relates to code paths. pthread_mutex_destroy() has to be called in order for the assert to fail. I presume there are code paths in which the lock isn't acquired. > Looking at: > > # ldd /usr/bin/nslookup > /usr/bin/nslookup: > libcrypto.so.6 => /lib/libcrypto.so.6 (0x20000000403fc000) > libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x20000000406c0000) > libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x20000000406fe000) > > I wonder if I also have to rebuild in > /usr/src/secure/lib (for libthr.so) ? > /usr/src/lib (for libc.so) ? No, I don't think so. The problem is with the caller of the function, which is in libisc. I'll look into it this afternoon, -- Marcel Moolenaar xcllnt@mac.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C6A68F32-67C9-4CC2-A7D0-AD2B2EBBA9B8>