Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 22:01:13 +0200 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav <des@des.no> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> Subject: Re: svn commit: r204591 - in head: sbin/ipfw sys/conf sys/net sys/netinet sys/netinet/ipfw sys/netinet/ipfw/test Message-ID: <20100302200113.GF2489@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <861vg2a433.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <201003021740.o22HemPA096942@svn.freebsd.org> <20100302185130.GC2489@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20100302190344.GA5490@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20100302192845.GD2489@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <861vg2a433.fsf@ds4.des.no>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 08:58:08PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote: > Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> writes: > > The question I do not know answer for, is why do we need LDADD. > > LDADD tells the linker to link ipfw with libutil. > > DPADD tells make to relink ipfw if libutil changes. > > You can do without DPADD, but incremental builds (i.e. "make buildworld > -DNO_CLEAN" or simply "make") won't work properly. I know this, but I do not understand why bsd.mk cannot deduce LDADD value from DPADD automatically. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkuNbokACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4ioWACg46zRNDv2wA4yGggkMEIcFx4v gUgAoKfvYt2oTtVNmrzJ8Wj1dTaZGXOp =uSi4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100302200113.GF2489>