Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 06:32:47 +0200 (SAT) From: John Hay <jhay@mikom.csir.co.za> To: mike@smith.net.au (Mike Smith) Cc: wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPv6 in -current Message-ID: <199810300432.GAA05271@zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za> In-Reply-To: <199810300030.QAA01188@dingo.cdrom.com> from Mike Smith at "Oct 29, 98 04:30:12 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > It would look Really Good on, say, 3.1-RELEASE release notes to say: > > * Full IPv6 implementation in-kernel and libc! > > Just a thought :) > > It would suck, however, if the consensus was that we rushed the > integration just to get the check-mark item. The people in the driving > seat are acutely aware of the pros and cons, and I'm inclined to accept > their judgement (while also accepting that supportive noise from the > userbase such as yours is also *extremely* valuable). Well it is because I don't want it rushed that I'm talking about it now. It is just after the release with a few months before the next 3.x release and also we have waited until a few other OS vendors have brought versions with IPv6 included and others have anounced that their next version will have it in. That is not rushing, that is running in the middle of the pack. :-) John -- John Hay -- John.Hay@mikom.csir.co.za To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199810300432.GAA05271>