Date: Thu, 1 May 1997 13:41:37 +1000 (EST) From: "Daniel O'Callaghan" <danny@panda.hilink.com.au> To: Brian Somers <brian@awfulhak.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: netscape via pppd cannot seem to get name service Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970501133619.237O-100000@panda.hilink.com.au> In-Reply-To: <199705010055.BAA12276@awfulhak.demon.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 1 May 1997, Brian Somers wrote: > > As Daniel O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > > I have announced this on freebsd-isp a few times. Time for -hackers, I > > > guess. > > > > No, time to make it a port. :-) > > pppkit.tgz isn't really port material IMHO, as it's essentially > a set of patches for pppd AFAIK. > > I think most of this should be brought into -current (and maybe > back-ported to 2.2). I havn't tried things out, but the README > looks good. I have already committed the pppd changes to -current. I've been running them on my own 2.2 system for a month or so, so I'm confident of putting them into 2.2. David Nugent has a C program which operates as a ppplogin, which would be better than my ppplogin.sh. > Danny, if you're desperate for a tester, I can look at it at > some point, but I can't promise when - I've got lots to do at > the moment. Thanks for the offer. I think the changes are burned in on 2.2 OK here at HiLink, so I'll put them in this weekend, probably. Are there any objections to my adding gettytab entries in the ppp.9600 - ppp.115200 family in 2.2 and -current? Danny
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.970501133619.237O-100000>