Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 12 Apr 1996 18:50:11 +0100
From:      "Gary Palmer" <gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG>
To:        Brett Glass <Brett_Glass@ccgate.infoworld.com>
Cc:        Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au>, jacs@gnome.co.uk, hardware@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Micropolis 1991 AV 9GB Drive 
Message-ID:  <5759.829331411@palmer.demon.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 12 Apr 1996 08:20:02 PST." <9603128293.AA829326577@ccgate.infoworld.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brett Glass wrote in message ID
<9603128293.AA829326577@ccgate.infoworld.com>:
> Average access times are supposed to be 11 ms. The fastest commonly
> available drives are 8 ms, and the latest PC IDE drives sit at 12 ms or so.
> Also, the 9 GB drives have huge amounts of data per cylinder and fast
> spindle speeds. Why would they be slow?

That's for sequential data accessing ... random data accessing across
the entire disk is NASTY, esp. if you use it for a news spool, which
generally requires accessing nearly every point on the disk very
frequently.

Gary




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5759.829331411>