Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 18:04:58 +0200 From: Farid Hajji <me@farid-hajji.de> To: Uwe Doering <gemini@geminix.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Virtual Server Message-ID: <200307071805.02111.me@farid-hajji.de> In-Reply-To: <3F093C1D.6030601@geminix.org> References: <20030705163119.4709fe81.redbrick1@terra.com.br> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0307062249230.10377@olmec> <3F093C1D.6030601@geminix.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 07 July 2003 11:23 am, Uwe Doering wrote: > I'm not sure whether you mean us (EscapeBox). We don't call our > solution a "virtual server", for a good reason, however. Around fall [...] > We are certainly not happy about having to engage in this kind of > marketing BS. We'd rather prefer to work on further improving our > product since we are technicians at heart. Unfortunately we had to act > to escape said collective virtual server bashing. If you simply stated on your web pages that you're offering some jail(8)-based hosting... If a company mentions FreeBSD, its most likely that they'll provide some jail(8)s, with or without root access. Strangely, very few companies admit this, even if it's obvious both in the industry and to better informed sysadmins... I would stay clear of companies that are not openly stating their core technology. If you modified the kernel to better suit your needs, that's okay, and your trade secret. That is not the problem here. Just be open about what you're offering, and the credibility issues quickly melt away. matrix(8) would have been a better marketing term though... :-) Good luck, -FH. -- Farid Hajji. http://www.farid-hajji.net/address.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200307071805.02111.me>