Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 11:44:36 +0200 From: Attilio Rao <attilio@FreeBSD.org> To: Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri <almarrie@gmail.com> Cc: "youshi10@u.washington.edu" <youshi10@u.washington.edu>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel C2D COREs not used equally in FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT i386 Message-ID: <46653084.7080502@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <499c70c0706041456x1a448348mec7410678c1f1d7d@mail.gmail.com> References: <499c70c0706041119o6c290fb3k7f234492df2f6548@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.43.0706041428260.27541@hymn02.u.washington.edu> <499c70c0706041441q4d4f13adtebd979ec87f71558@mail.gmail.com> <466488F0.9070802@FreeBSD.org> <499c70c0706041456x1a448348mec7410678c1f1d7d@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > Attilio, > > Thanks for explaining the issue deeper. > > So is fixing this issue would make FreeBSD runs apps faster than Linux > or we will get the same result that linux offers now? This is not intended to improve the quickness of a program per-se (I'm not saying it is impossible to happen, just that it would be a side effect), but it is intended to improve scalabilty. I expect a very good boost up on scalabilty for us by these jeff's efforts, but quantify now is not very simple. Time will say better than me. Attiliohome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46653084.7080502>