Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 23 Oct 2013 11:28:22 -0700
From:      Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To:        Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>
Cc:        "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com>, freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7cher@yandex.ru>
Subject:   Re: [rfc] removing the NDISulator
Message-ID:  <CAJ-Vmonh-oE7hgWaZj3oc-GvEhkFsrpE_7XvEATjJGy-gcVUtA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5268124E.4040906@mu.org>
References:  <5265878B.1050809@yandex.ru> <201310212146.r9LLkqZ1044966@fire.js.berklix.net> <CAJ-VmomzydOD-M1oePMuqrgdBCFMTXKCZcGVwu%2BLFTnHTGg0Kw@mail.gmail.com> <201310231023.32351.jhb@freebsd.org> <526810DB.20705@mu.org> <CAJ-VmonHcksMgQZ%2BmiLu%2BL60auRyTOAcENBFkpaA1xEWJXeQRw@mail.gmail.com> <5268124E.4040906@mu.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Because the Linux stuff is mostly very GPL.

Adrian
On Oct 23, 2013 2:15 PM, "Alfred Perlstein" <bright@mu.org> wrote:

> On 10/23/13 11:11 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
>> On 23 October 2013 11:09, Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>  Eh, having taken a stab at porting the bwl blob already, I would strongly
>>>
>>>> oppose removing NDIS.  If you do that I will just stop using my netbook
>>>> with a Broadcom part altogether as I wouldn't be able to use it to try
>>>> to
>>>> test bwl changes.  The NDIS thing is a bit hackish, but it is quite
>>>> useful
>>>> for a lot of folks.
>>>>
>>>>   I have to agree.  Deprecation != motivation.
>>>>
>>>
>> I can pull out examples of this not holding true:
>>
>> * all the giant locking in drivers
>> * all the giant locking in VFS
>>
>> People did pop up and claim ownership of things they cared about. Some
>> stuff died, some stuff didn't. There was enough of a motivation by us to
>> kill giant off in these pathways so things could continue to evolve. We
>> didn't leave the GIANT crutch in forever.
>>
>>
>>  Sure, however those drivers and vfs systems were not sustainable and
> holding the kernel back.
>
> What part of the NDISulator actually holds the system back?  I'm saying
> that it seems as if it was conjecture rather than a need.  Is the
> NDISulator giant locked?
>
> Also why the interest in writing drivers so much?  Being able to leverage
> other platform drivers is pretty neat and saves us a ton of work.
>
> --
> Alfred Perlstein
>
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmonh-oE7hgWaZj3oc-GvEhkFsrpE_7XvEATjJGy-gcVUtA>