Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:53:32 -0400 From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Cc: Jia-Shiun Li <jiashiun@gmail.com>, Sergey G Nasonov <snasonov@bcc.ru> Subject: Re: ATA subsystem lost drive after resume process Message-ID: <200809251353.35790.jkim@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1d6d20bc0809251039v3010d4b7hfdf6ea31e68138ba@mail.gmail.com> References: <200807151124.36621.snasonov@bcc.ru> <1d6d20bc0809251039v3010d4b7hfdf6ea31e68138ba@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 25 September 2008 01:39 pm, Jia-Shiun Li wrote: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Sergey G Nasonov <snasonov@bcc.ru> wrote: > > Hello all. > > > > I have a laptop Lenovo T61 with a FreeBSD current installed on > > it. uname -a > > > > I want to understand why suspend/resume does not work. Suspend > > process works ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE > > taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > > ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - > > completing request directly > > Another me-too, but slight different. > > When running freebsd in vmware. If I assign two cpus to the vm, > after using vmware's suspend and resume (not suspending from > freebsd), the vm often hang due to ata taskqueue timeout. If only > one cpu is assigned then everything is ok. SMP kernel does not support suspend/resume ATM. FYI, Takanori Watanabe posted preliminary patches here, though: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200805131125.m4DBPu1q092741 Jung-uk Kim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200809251353.35790.jkim>