Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 19:30:27 +0100 From: Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl> To: Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie> Cc: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net>, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release/sysinstall install.c Message-ID: <20020108193027.A16263@freebie.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <200201081552.aa79631@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>; from iedowse@maths.tcd.ie on Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 03:52:48PM %2B0000 References: <47888.1010483823@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> <200201081552.aa79631@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 03:52:48PM +0000, Ian Dowse wrote: > In message <47888.1010483823@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za>, Sheldon Hearn writes: > >Okay, now you're scaring me. > > > >What should I do? Should I leave the new newfs defaults intact for > >4.5-RC1 so we can get feedback, or should I just back out the newfs > >defaults changes and play it safe for 4.5-RELEASE? > > I'm not sure, but something needs to be done before 4.5 anyway. The > following patch should address the i386 issue. It's not ideal, but > it removes the hard-coded block size, and should deal with the case > where you access different filesystems with different block sizes > from boot2. > > I'll have a look at the alpha code shortly to see if something > similar can be done. Maybe there we can just increase the BUFSIZE > definition to 32k? What still puzzles me is why it works for some us without problems. Does anyone have ideas on that one? -- | / o / /_ _ email: wilko@FreeBSD.org |/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte Arnhem, The Netherlands To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020108193027.A16263>