Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 06:55:09 -0800 (PST) From: chrish@UltimateDNS.NET To: "A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven" <freebsd@skysmurf.nl> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [games/ofortune] CFT and pending issues Message-ID: <0de1dbb77b9352e1546e777dbed1fee9.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> In-Reply-To: <20131206133709.GA60741@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> References: <20131205215437.GA32134@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> <20131206133709.GA60741@spectrum.skysmurf.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Update: the port is pretty much ready for submission. I decided to go with > misc/fortune-mod-offensive, similar to the other ones (one of which is > unmaintained so I'll try to stagify and adopt that one while I'm at it). > The COMMENT became > The offensive fortunes from FreeBSD 9 base, removed in FreeBSD 10 > because it has to stay within 70 characters. > > There's one issue I'd really prefer to sort before submitting, though. > Should the Makefile define LICENSE? If so, what should it be (BSD I > presume) and should LICENSE_FILE be defined as well? Given that it /used/ to be part of *BSD. Maybe the (current) BSD license, or the MIT 3-clause would be most appropriate. Just a thought. --Chris > > AvW > > -- > I'm not completely useless, I can be used as a bad example. >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0de1dbb77b9352e1546e777dbed1fee9.authenticated>