Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:28:49 -0700 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org> Cc: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@freebsd.org>, doc-committers@freebsd.org, svn-doc-all@freebsd.org, svn-doc-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r49333 - head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/versions Message-ID: <1907546.hPWxX4FEK0@ralph.baldwin.cx> In-Reply-To: <B67A5C958E180F57FF3A355F@ogg.in.absolight.net> References: <201608241549.u7OFn4g3095225@repo.freebsd.org> <B67A5C958E180F57FF3A355F@ogg.in.absolight.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Wednesday, August 24, 2016 05:58:46 PM Mathieu Arnold wrote: > +--On 24 août 2016 15:49:04 +0000 "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@FreeBSD.org> > wrote: > | Author: ache (src,ports committer) > | Date: Wed Aug 24 15:49:04 2016 > | New Revision: 49333 > | URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/doc/49333 > | > | Log: > | 1) Remove again 1200001. This change was backed out, but was restored > | here for the reason unknown. > | 2) Describe 1200004. > | > | Modified: > | head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/versions/chapter.xml > | > | Modified: head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/versions/chapter.xml > | ========================================================================= > | ===== --- > | head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/versions/chapter.xml Wed Aug > | 24 11:56:25 2016 (r49332) +++ > | head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/versions/chapter.xml Wed Aug > | 24 15:49:04 2016 (r49333) @@ -6228,10 +6228,10 @@ > | </row> > | > | <row> > | - <entry>1200001</entry> > | - <entry>July 12, 2016</entry> > | - <entry>12.0-CURRENT after removing collation for [a-z]-type ranges > | - <revnumber>302512</revnumber>.</entry> > | + <entry>1200004</entry> > | + <entry>August 24, 2016</entry> > | + <entry>12.0-CURRENT after fixing LC_*_MASK for newlocale(3) and > | querylocale(3) + (rev <revnumber>304703</revnumber>).</entry> > | </row> > > I think it wrong to remove a version entry, there should be a 1200002 that > backs out 1200001, and that should be pointed out, or something. Agreed. Ideally all osreldate values are documented. We could add annotations to earlier entries to say "reverted in xxxx" or some such, but we shouldn't remove entries. -- John Baldwinhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1907546.hPWxX4FEK0>