Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 07:54:46 +0100 From: David Chisnall <theraven@freebsd.org> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-numerics@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org>, "current@freebsd.org Current" <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: clang+libc++ using missing powl Message-ID: <4DF3383B-4BE7-4947-886A-AAAD25172F68@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20130905210953.GA58413@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20130904223842.GB82066@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <80062343-53CD-4CEF-9C47-3BF614DADB64@FreeBSD.org> <20130905210953.GA58413@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 5 Sep 2013, at 22:09, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 09:52:13AM +0100, David Chisnall wrote: >> On 4 Sep 2013, at 23:38, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> wrote: >> >>> As a result we have a lot of fallouts of ports complaining about: >>> undefined reference to `powl' >>> >>> It seems like libc++ is relying on a function we don't have yet >>> in libm, am I missing something? >> >> I've attached a diff that I'd like to commit to msun > > Why not disable libc++ from exposing these functions? Because they're in the C++ spec and they should work. I consider this a placeholder until we have the real versions in the tree (the wiki says you have coshl, sinhl, and tanhl, in progress, any idea of an ETA for them)? Davidhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4DF3383B-4BE7-4947-886A-AAAD25172F68>