Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 07:54:46 +0100 From: David Chisnall <theraven@freebsd.org> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-numerics@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org>, "current@freebsd.org Current" <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: clang+libc++ using missing powl Message-ID: <4DF3383B-4BE7-4947-886A-AAAD25172F68@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20130905210953.GA58413@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20130904223842.GB82066@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <80062343-53CD-4CEF-9C47-3BF614DADB64@FreeBSD.org> <20130905210953.GA58413@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 5 Sep 2013, at 22:09, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 09:52:13AM +0100, David Chisnall wrote: >> On 4 Sep 2013, at 23:38, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> wrote: >> >>> As a result we have a lot of fallouts of ports complaining about: >>> undefined reference to `powl' >>> >>> It seems like libc++ is relying on a function we don't have yet >>> in libm, am I missing something? >> >> I've attached a diff that I'd like to commit to msun > > Why not disable libc++ from exposing these functions? Because they're in the C++ spec and they should work. I consider this a placeholder until we have the real versions in the tree (the wiki says you have coshl, sinhl, and tanhl, in progress, any idea of an ETA for them)? Davidhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4DF3383B-4BE7-4947-886A-AAAD25172F68>