Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:29:40 -0700 (MST) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: ru@FreeBSD.org Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, obrien@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile.inc1 src/tools/build Makefile Message-ID: <20080122.102940.1586015611.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20080122171051.GB19248@team.vega.ru> References: <20080122155427.GB16573@team.vega.ru> <20080122.095757.1159151185.imp@bsdimp.com> <20080122171051.GB19248@team.vega.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20080122171051.GB19248@team.vega.ru>
Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> writes:
: > : I only wonder how was the value of 600029 choosen?
: >
: > It was two revisions before the branch point for RELENG_6, which
: > happened at 600031.
:
: I think you're twice off-by-one here,
:
: : $ cvs -R ann -rRELENG_6_BP param.h | grep '#define.*__FreeBSD_version'
: :
: : Annotations for param.h
: : ***************
: : 1.244 (sam 11-Jul-05): #define __FreeBSD_version 600032 /* Master, propagated to newvers */
:
: but it still doesn't answer my question. Why you've choosen
: this __FreeBSD_version and not RELENG_6_BP (i.e., 600032).
: I don't mind it, just want to understand the formulae. :-)
Maybe I should have selected this. I wanted to select the version
that would work rather than the branch point. Maybe this was silly of
me.
: > It also is one greater than the largest if that
: > was removed.
:
: Can you elaborate on what you mean here? I don't understand.
: Thanks.
The following line:
.if ${BOOTSTRAPPING} < 600029
was the line with the biggest number on the right hand side of the <
that was removed. Meaning that anything 600029 and newer will still
work.
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080122.102940.1586015611.imp>