Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 07:56:54 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 291519] Suggest update to the termcap database/ghostty Message-ID: <bug-291519-227-SlxySqqpo4@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-291519-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=291519 --- Comment #6 from Oliver Epper <oliver.epper@gmail.com> --- Ok. So Ghostty brings its own terminfo that supports colors. You can get it from within Ghostty simply by running infocmp. You can run either `infocmp -C`, or `infocmp | tic -C -` to get a termcap compatible entry. But termcap seems to have limited support for capabilities compared to terminfo. I am not sure if it is ok to put terminfo entires into FreeBSDs termcap file. I am suprised, that xterm-256color brings the "terminfo"-capability "Color#256". If that is ok, we could simply copy the terminfo entry for Ghostty, right? I think that would be clearer. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-291519-227-SlxySqqpo4>
