Date: Fri, 13 Feb 1998 21:38:56 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> Cc: committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: devfs persistence Message-ID: <199802140238.VAA28185@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <19980214024018.55619@follo.net> References: <3896.887413886@critter.freebsd.dk> <199802140018.QAA05385@dingo.cdrom.com> <19980214024018.55619@follo.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Sat, 14 Feb 1998 02:40:18 +0100, Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> said: > cases. Now, _including this requirement_, wouldn't it still feel good > to actually get DEVFS integrated and usable as the default _now_? No. I see no particular need for DEVFS. While it certainly moves some problems around, it's a substantial break with the POLA. (I didn't always think so, but considering the vigor of this flame war, it's clear that we are not even close to consensus.) -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199802140238.VAA28185>