Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 09:47:05 +0100 From: "Thomas E. Zander" <riggs@rrr.de> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> Cc: FreeBSD amd64 mailing list <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] if_sk(4) rx/tx "hangs" Message-ID: <20041115084705.GQ64152@marvin.riggiland.au> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0411150746530.85716@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0411130037360.85716@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> <20041115070404.GP64152@marvin.riggiland.au> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0411150746530.85716@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--L2Brqb15TUChFOBK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Mon, 15. Nov 2004, at 7:58 +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote according to [Re: [PATCH] if_sk(4) rx/tx "hangs"]: > what other patches did you apply ? This morning just the ram patch. > could you please get the version from HEAD (should also work just fine > with 5-STABLE) and tell me the results (including the additional dmesg > lines but only the sk* parts). Of course, I'll do it tonight asap. > From the output I had already seen from you it seems we both have > exactly the same chip so this is a bit strange. Well, afair you haven't got the "watchdog timeout" messages, have you? That's another strange difference considering our chips should be identical. Riggs --=20 - "[...] I talked to the computer at great length and -- explained my view of the Universe to it" said Marvin. --- And what happened?" pressed Ford. ---- "It committed suicide." said Marvin. --L2Brqb15TUChFOBK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFBmG0JjdSJKchZls0RAmWUAJoCsADwwX8eqKSjkMboZUrXHX+w6QCffzLd Pa0iJXr7BQl/ct3YrfRJiDk= =mOxa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --L2Brqb15TUChFOBK--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041115084705.GQ64152>