Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 08 Jul 2000 23:13:57 +0900
From:      "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com>
To:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: /sys hierarchy
Message-ID:  <39673725.A0059A9E@newsguy.com>
References:  <20000702114353.C19714@freebie.wbnet> <200007021744.KAA34748@john.baldwin.cx> <20000702135349.F96427@dragon.nuxi.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David O'Brien wrote:
> 
> > Sounds good to me actually.  Although, should it be ${MACHINE_ARCH}/compile
> > instead in keeping with the mentioned goal of keeping all MD stuff under
> > ${MACHINE_ARCH}?
> 
> I would prefer /sys/compile/<ARCH> as it makes it easier to make a
> symlink to another place.  Unless of course we get /usr/obj working for
> kernel compiles....

Huh? All my kernels created with buildkernel are compiled in /usr/obj.

-- 
Daniel C. Sobral			(8-DCS)
dcs@newsguy.com
dcs@freebsd.org
capo@the.great.underground.bsdconpiracy.org

		<jkh> _DES: The Book of Bruce has only one sentence in it, and it says
"the actual directives of my cult are left as an exercise for the
reader. Good luck."
		<EE> jkh: does it really include the 'good luck' part?
		<jkh> EE: OK, I made that part up.
		<jkh> EE: I figured it should sound a bit more cheery than how Bruce
initially dictated it to me.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?39673725.A0059A9E>