Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:59:59 -0500 From: Ben Kelly <ben@wanderview.com> To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WITHOUT_MODULES, does it actually work? Message-ID: <BB106D32-DF64-4086-801F-286050314200@wanderview.com> In-Reply-To: <4B034899.9090408@FreeBSD.org> References: <200911172021.16848.gnemmi@gmail.com> <41D86F39-D98A-4195-8345-765E0F742FAE@wanderview.com> <19e9a5dc0911171614l42f4c90ci2abce9982727ef61@mail.gmail.com> <4B033E22.3060700@FreeBSD.org> <8727F2A4-B830-43EE-BB9B-A17798374C00@wanderview.com> <4B034899.9090408@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 17, 2009, at 8:06 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> Ben Kelly wrote:
>> It seems there are some left over bits then. I have this in =
/usr/src/sys/modules/Makefile:
>>=20
>> .for reject in ${WITHOUT_MODULES}
>> SUBDIR:=3D ${SUBDIR:N${reject}}
>> .endfor
>=20
> Well it seems my search was not exhaustive.
>=20
> My recommendation then would be to file a src PR so that someone can
> look into it. :)
I've opened a doc PR for the bad example in the handbook and a conf PR =
for the patch to make WITHOUT_MODULES work from the kernel config file =
using makeoptions. I haven't gotten PR numbers back from the system =
yet.
- Ben=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BB106D32-DF64-4086-801F-286050314200>