Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 23:37:33 -0800 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Increasing the size of dev_t and ino_t Message-ID: <3C8C5EBD.94E88534@mindspring.com> References: <88790.1015831305@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > FWIW, and so that you understand what you have commented upon: > > I was referring to your ability to talk and talk and talk without > ever checking your facts or submitting patches. I do both. Check the list archives. And unlike some people, I publically admit when I'm wrong. > The fact that we not only have to read your emails but also > debunk them to avoid your misleading people with the 15% of > facts you got wrong is an incredible waste of time. So what exactly were you debunking in my posting, again? Or is this a general mean-spirited comment because you're feeling hypersensitive any time anyone mentions a 64 bit time_t, because the discussion might get around to Kirk's posting of 26 Oct 2001? ] I left the spare space in the inode in anticipation of 64-bit ] time_t values. Unfortunately, it was coopted for other purposes. ] I am working on a major revision to UFS that uses 64-bit block ] pointers. I intend to put in 64-bit times as part of the revision. ] ] Kirk McKusick -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C8C5EBD.94E88534>