Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 17:06:47 +0100 From: j mckitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: removing inb()/outb() from devices Message-ID: <20010525170647.B21603@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <200105251556.f4PFujl42699@billy-club.village.org>; from imp@village.org on Fri, May 25, 2001 at 09:56:45AM -0600 References: <20010525164033.A21603@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20010523171539.A43898@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <200105250206.f4P26wl39972@billy-club.village.org> <20010525164033.A21603@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <200105251556.f4PFujl42699@billy-club.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
| Yes, but it does make sense to do that. Some busses you cannot access | the resources until they have been activated. pcmcia comes to mind :-). ah, but of course. :-) Well, then, let me know if my plan is acceptable: I will newbussify all macros, and any inb/outb calls i find that are not inside a probe function. How is that? jcm -- "I drank WHAT ?!" - Socrates To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010525170647.B21603>